Line fishing with one of my dogs - Page 14

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Chaz Reinhold

by Chaz Reinhold on 23 April 2017 - 00:04

Dimes were worth more back then. What can that dog do today?

Baerenfangs Erbe

by Baerenfangs Erbe on 23 April 2017 - 02:04

Are we actually talking about a green dog here? You know, an untrained, green dog?



Mithuna

by Mithuna on 23 April 2017 - 04:04

Baren

That dog lived in early 80's was bred by Malcolm Griffith. Maybe Hundemutt can find out from him about the Kai V Silberbrand son ( call name : Pirate ) that he sold to Nagib Ali of Von Alihaus Kennels.

Baerenfangs Erbe

by Baerenfangs Erbe on 23 April 2017 - 05:04

I just want to see a dog that can search for over an hour with the same consistent intensity without getting tired in the least.

by vk4gsd on 23 April 2017 - 05:04

1 hour????

My unit of measure for hunt drive is days and miles under extreme conditions.

You guys know nothing important about dogs, its just theatrics to look like they are working. I mean that very literally.

Baerenfangs Erbe

by Baerenfangs Erbe on 23 April 2017 - 15:04

I don't think you understand what the difference between Hunt Drive and training is.
This is something that needs to be trained. No dog magically can search for days at a time to find something he doesn't even understand he's looking for.
The greater the raw natural hunt drive, the better the dog to train up so they can search for days at a time. However, it's trained. They don't just start out with the mental capacity from the get go.


by Bavarian Wagon on 24 April 2017 - 16:04

Everyone has their own “high standards” they’re not standardized (look up what that means) and no one can explain them to you without saying “well my dogs meet it.” It’s not a standard if it’s not standardized. Everyone’s personal ideas aren’t standards, they’re just what you want to breed. God bless America where that’s allowed and no one really questions it or says anything negative to help others see the holes in people’s claims. The best statement is “I do it for the breed” even though the production of a few dozen dogs, that don’t end up catching anyone’s eye and really producing anything in large enough numbers doesn’t do much for the breed as a whole. Nothing wrong with producing good stable dogs and giving families good experiences with a shepherd, but the difficulty of that is overblown and isn’t rocket science as most want to make it out to be. Very very few dogs are failing at being pets because of their own issues. Kennel/line blind breeders? Sure. But all of them will also tell you that they’re breeding to their own high standards (again, not really standards by definition).

susie

by susie on 24 April 2017 - 17:04

I tend to be a " non-believer" ( is this even a word? ) ...

In case a puppy was "selected" due to some skills (like hunt drive) I want to see proof later on, that said in case I selected for SAR skills I want to see an official SAR title later on.

I really believe in "selection" - but later on I await proof ( and not: he/she COULD do in case I would ...).






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top