Where the Hell is Obama? - Page 7

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by SitasMom on 05 November 2012 - 17:11

Have you noticed the "internals" (weighting) of the polls?
The percentage of democrats vs republicans vs independents...
They are skewed to favor Obama.

CNN Poll - tied at 49..........but the weighting is:
Democrats over sampled by 11%.
Romney is still up by 22% with independents.

Without the skew the poll outcome would be 54 / 46 for Romney.........

BTW, the Redskins lost, so the challenger will win........(Romney)...LOL

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 05 November 2012 - 17:11

* "I am really going to have a tough time making a decision on Tuesday." *

Jim, Jim, Jim -- think about it, please. Your RPWI notarized affidavit will be your most intelligent decision ever made in your entire political life. Not only that but .. well, it's your choice after all.  LMAO  Personally, I encourage everyone to do it because I care about the US Constitution and love LIFE, in general. But there are hidden perks.

You can Join the Ron Paul Revolution and just Write In for President = Congressman Ronald Ernest Paul and Write in Vice President =  Judge Andrew Napolitano.

After you Write In Ron and Andrew - don't forget to upload your notarized Affidavit. This is it.

If Ron Paul has enough write ins in only 7 states (yes, the 7 states the MSM keeps talking about - lol) WE OWN the Electoral College like Abe Lincoln did. It's a long shot, I know, but it did happen to Lincoln, ya know. As a matter of fact, Ron Paul has enough write in states to win with 302 with some to spare. So, really we have 2 chances of winning still (winning only 7 states or winning only 4%(?) of each write-in friendly state). Very slim chances, but still chances nonetheless.

Write-in Friendly States and Electoral College count. These States below count Write-Ins - must have full name on ballot (Ronald Ernest Paul / Judge Andrew Napolitano) to count.

Alabama=9
Alaska=3
California=55
Connecticut=7
Colorado=9
Iowa=6
Kansas=6
Kentucky=8
Maine=4
Maryland=11
Massachusetts=11
Minnesota=17
Mississippi=6
Missouri=10
Nebraska=5
New Hampshire=4
New Jersey=15
New York=29
North Dakota=3
North Carolina=15
Oregon=7
Rhode Island=4
Pennsylvania=20
Vermont=3
Washington=12
Washington DC=3
Wisconsin=10
Wyoming=10

Unknown potentials:

Florida=29
Hawaii=4

Happy Voting !!


by Ibrahim on 05 November 2012 - 17:11

Beetree,

Saddam wasn't that bad, to evaluate a leader you must evaluate him based on the culture of people and course of development. Now Saddam was excellent for his country and his own people, don't be taken aback, yes that is the truth. In our region we are not fully prepared yet for democracy game. Saddam built a strong army, Saddam built hospitals, schools, universities. Saddam did mistakes but not the mistakes you were fed by your media.
Saddam was a friend of America and was supported by the gulf states as well as Europe and The U.S till after his war against Iran was over and he made a mistake of invading Kuwait, and mind you a signal was given to him by US ambassador in Baghdad to do so, that was his biggest mistake.
Iraq under Saddam was much better than under those present thieves, just watch what is going on now in Iraq.
The difference between our peoples is that Saddam is looked at here as a Hero, while you say removing him from power was a good thing.
Removing Qathafi from power was a good thing, but see what is happenning now in Libya!!! Democracy should come step by step and gradually and softly, the way it was given to Libyans is just like giving some children sharp tools to play fight and win games, they would injure themselves if not kill each other, if you ask me if what is going on in Libya is Obama's mistake, I think not.

Ibrahim

Ninja181

by Ninja181 on 05 November 2012 - 18:11

Moons,

Robin Hood = Take from the rich to give to the poor. Looting for the poor. Just a joke. Along the lines of what you and BE were saying to help those in need from the hurricane.

by beetree on 05 November 2012 - 19:11

I don't know Ibrahim, you said, "Saddam wasn't that bad, to evaluate a leader you must evaluate him based on the culture of people and course of development." 

This statement causes me some problem because when we prosecute a crooked politician over here, that is always the argument spoken in their defense: "But he did this good thing here, or that good thing over there." What is most often then overlooked, is how that is usually just the tip of what could have been done.  That is where society ends up paying the most and it is the one's on the bottom who are usually fooled the most by such terms ..."wasn't that bad,.."

IMHO
beetree


by Ibrahim on 05 November 2012 - 19:11

Exchanging info and opinions is a good thing, people understand each other better. You see beetree, in our region what is good might be far from acceptable in America. I love my King, I have nothing against him, only thing I wish and ask for some more freedom, I also love our Queen Teeth Smile.
Now in the US maybe you won't accept a king who inherited power from his father who inherited power himself from his father and so on to rule you, by the West values and culture this is history that is done with. I think our King is the best option for us at this time in our state and is much better for us than Brother Muslims who will take us backwards and maybe cause unpeaceful environment.
Some American might call our King a bad thing for Jordan, I can understand that, but the truth is he's a lovely and fair ruler, his wife is a beauty Wink Smile and I don't complain seeing her on TV every now and then.

Ibrahim

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 05 November 2012 - 19:11

Ninja,
There are those who certainly would be helped, just as there are some who would not be tolerated.
Looting is a slippery slope, there are varied degrees of what one might call looting, when one is starving it is irrelevant, of course you can't eat merchandise, that is just common theft.
And looting a store is one thing, taking from individuals is something else.
Those in need from the hurricane should not need to loot since we have the resources to air lift tons of supplies anywhere on the planet, so why is it so impossible from just a couple of states away?
As I said before also, the east coast residents just didn't know what a hurricane is, they were warned but didn't see what it was gonna be like to actually get hit.
No one is ever really prepared for a hurricane, all you can do it get as far away as you can, hard to do when you live in a major city and impossible if you don't have the resources or ability to escape.
I live with the possibility of tornadoes, yet I have no underground shelter, and with a tornado you get little or no warning time so no time to run.
We all have risks of one form or another and should at least have some idea of what we will do to cope.
Mother nature does not have any mercy at all does she, and she doesn't care if your rich or poor.

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 05 November 2012 - 19:11

Taking from the rich to give to the poor after a natural disaster ? That is nonsense. Everything is broken, tattered and torn and you think picking up clothes, wood, tools, and anything salvagable laying around is "taking from the rich to give to the poor" ?

Unbelievable.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 05 November 2012 - 19:11

I think ninja took it the wrong way when we said we'd not be willing to take everyone in during a disaster and would resort to violence to protect home and resources if need be.

Ninja181

by Ninja181 on 05 November 2012 - 20:11

BE,

Before your time there was a program on TV, aka Robin Hood. I'm sure Moons will remember the program.

I was refering to that program, they said (in the program) Robin Hood Stole from the rich to give to the poor. 

I wasn't being mean or smart.

Now, go lay down, platz! LOL





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top