Man hat mich heute mehrmals danach befragt ob Harley nun endgültig aus dem Zuchtbuch gestrichen werden wird. Meine Antwort ist eindeutig!
Es gibt keine andere Möglichkeit diesen Betrug zu ahnden! Die Regeln sowie die Erfahrungen lassen keinen anderen Beschluss zu!

Sollte Harley im Zuchtbuch eingetragen bleiben, bzw. NICHT gestrichen werden, dann spielt der SV ungestraft russisches Roulette mit der Gesundheit des Deutschen Schäferhundes.
Desweiteren sind wir dann auf die Prozesse der Besitzer aller Tell von der Rieser Perle-Nachkommen höchst gespannt.

Wir rekapitulieren: Wir hatten es dort zu tun mit nicht weniger als 63 Hunde im Inland, wovon heute bereits 53 OFFIZIELL aus dem SV-Zuchtbuch des SV gestrichen worden sind, siehe bitte SV-Zeitung von Oktober 2011, und mit mindestens 34 Hunde die zwar im Ausland geboren wurden, aber ebenfalls gestrichen werden sollten, wenn sie denn nach Deutschland kommen würden, also insgesamt nicht weniger als 97 Hunde. (Lesen Sie dazu unsere Dokumentation in Beilage.)

Rechnen wir pro Klagesumme in etwa 10.000 Euro, sollte sich der Verein jetzt schon einmal warm anziehen und gut überlegen, ob die Beiträge der Mitglieder nicht nachträglich bereits für 2012 erhöht werden müssen, um die Kostenlawine überhaupt bezahlen zu können.

Ich wollte an dieser Stelle die Stellungnahme des Tierarztes anbieten, aus der Praxis wo Jaguar geröntgt wurde, habe aber vollstes Verständnis dafür, dass wir dies zunächst einmal fairerweise nicht tun dürfen, ist der TA ja zumindest jetzt schon Kronzeuge in einem Strafverfahren wegen Betrug. Später vielleicht!

Also, auf gut Deutsch könnte man zusammenfassen: Rüden mit kaputten Ellenbogen bekommen im SV in Deutschland eine komplette Nachzuchteintragungssperre, und es spielt dabei nun wirklich keine Rolle ob der Nachwuchs in Deutschland, Guatemala oder Neuseeland geboren wurde!

Etwas anderes erlauben die Regeln NICHT!

Sollte der Hauptzuchtwart Reinhardt Meyer sich GEGEN die Nachzuchteintragungssperre aussprechen, ist er als Zuchtwart nicht länger tragbar und hätte in dem Verein der eine gesunde Zucht promotet nichts mehr zu suchen. Er würde sich gegen die Zuchtordnung  und somit gegen eine saubere Zucht kehren.

Is Harley born in Germany.

Jantie writes "It is NOT acceptable for GSD's in the SV-breed book that their parents have rotten hips or elbows!” and, I would extend that to any other health problem that is detrimental to our breed. Breeders must take into account all the factors behind any animal that is to be used for breeding and consider whether they be either prohibited from breeding or used sparingly. It does not matter where the dog is born if it carries with it anything that is any way harmful to the GSD. That is just common sense.

Breeding is not just about following and using the current successful animals. Many of these are placed because they are to be sold and the money people can get a better price for the dog. Corruption!!

To be successful a Breeder must have a good working knowledge of the breeding families and the qualities that they transmit whether they are from Germany or any other country. Unfortunately, health problems are kept behind closed doors where only a selected few are aware of the problems. For example there is a top male from the last Sieger show who has four well known epileptic producers behind him. These males were not from Germany and they were all active and producing epileptics around the same time. With this knowledge a prudent, genuine breeder would investigate whether this problem has bred on before actually using the dog. This type of information may take some time to find because of the secrecy that surrounds the problem. Readers please note that I am NOT suggesting that epileptic progeny has been produced by this dog.

It is not right that the SV and other governing bodies in other countries hold themselves out as having high values when the fact is that they turn a blind eye to what is happening. Worse still, when they are made aware and, the speed at which these matters are dealt with, the outcome is alarmingly slow in being published. If they do nothing then historically most of the problems go away and everything returns to just “business as usual”. Perhaps the time is coming in the breed where an “Arab Spring” is around the corner.

Mackenzie 

David, I fully understand your comments on regarding matters of procedure and I am in full agreement with that. I also agree that the condemnation of Harley before the responsible process is finalised is wrong.

Jantie has only used Harley, the best offspring from Jaguar, as the example for all of the Jaguar offspring to be stricken from the breeding book. That is a little different from actually condemning Harley for himself.

The SV have accepted the conclusions of the Swedish Authority in that a fraud has been committed. They have put their procedure in place to deal with the matter but what is the protocol for this? Does it include the following

1. The immediate suspension from a breeding programme of Jaguar and all of his progeny until the SV has reached a conclusion

2. As a fraud has been committed is there now a police investigation with the SV standing down until the police findings are concluded.

3. Have all the interested parties been summoned to give evidence and who are they

4. Who will lead the SV investigation and who will be assisting. Is it just one person alone. When will their identity be announced

Finally, who will judge the SV?

Mackenzie

David, please read what I have said again. You will see that the question that I raised was regarding the protocol for the SV enquiry and did it include the points I listed. There is no suggestion in my post that anyone should pass judgement on anything.

At this stage there is no indication that the matter will be placed before a Court of Justice and investigation by the SV will by no means fulfill that role. Your reference to the Courts of Justice and judgements is a well know process to everyone. The media provide sufficient information in their reporting for everyone to understand those processes.

I am certainly not a barackroom lawyer and if your read carefully you will see that I have passed opinion and raised legitimate questions but I have not passed judgement on anything. Whether they are right of wrong lynch mobs are motivated by emotion rather than reason and I certainly do not have that mentality.

Mackenzie