by RichCarne on 28 February 2018 - 16:02
Did you not read the part about dogs living in crates?
I would class this as abuse / neglect personally.
by Jenni78 on 28 February 2018 - 17:02
Brandi, I think you are misunderstanding the issue as a lot of people are seeing it. The issue was never that they had parvo. That, I think, is something everyone can sympathize with. The issue is that they HID it while FOURTEEN puppies died and were bagged up like trash. How you lose 14 pups you're treating is a little confusing, as parvo is brutal, but if caught early, can have reasonable treatment success. Surely, they would have had better success if treated as a vet would treat them, unless they were going to care for them around the clock as surely the vet writing the instructions expected.
While this was going on, they denied it, said there was only a coccidia and giardia outbreak which they were trying to remedy (this is according to the report), and continued to host public training on their property until word got out. Pretty irresponsible, in my opinion, and many others. With the sheer number of dogs they keep and sell, it isn't hard to imagine how far and fast this could spread. Additionally, having decoys work dogs there and travel afterwards to different clubs is another risk. The responsible thing to do, imo, would be to immediately put the property on lockdown. No dogs in, no dogs out. ADMIT tragedy has struck. Warn others.
Seems like if they had worried less about image and took the dogs to the vet, maybe 14 would not have died. I have to consider whether not wanting word to spread is the reason for not taking puppies to the vet. Better to hide the deaths than have everyone find out, maybe?
These are just my thoughts after reading the report and comparing it to what I heard beforehand (January). I don't know all the facts, and don't pretend to.
by Hundmutter on 28 February 2018 - 18:02
@ Jenni - good post, well said.
Plus: I am a bit concerned about the role of this man and woman, who pointed out where there were dogs in crates. Strikes me this could be one of two things: a couple of (staff ?) who'd decided (what, just for devilment ?) to make it seem something bad was going down; or a couple of staff who disagreed with what was happening and were trying to do something about it.
The proprietors presumably knew who these two people are / were; but did not appear (according to the Report) to contest what was said.
Disturbing, whichever way you look at it.
HOWEVER I remain unsure about the dead pups "being thrown out like trash" bit of this case. A bag can be opened again by someone seeking to take photos and make a point. But bagging dead puppies as a temporary measure until they can be fittingly disposed of is surely not that rare (or that awful) a method in itself, for a commercial kennel. Whether there are 14 or 4. It's not like this was one euthanised pet in its own home, to be transported to a vet surgery or crematorium for disposal - and its not unknown for bodies to be bagged up (temporarily) in trash bags even in those circumstances !
by hexe on 28 February 2018 - 20:02
On 2/8/2018, the inspectors both state that Mr. Smith was going to show them 'all the dogs', yet as they are leaving the property, they are flagged down by two employees who lead them to a room in 'an outbuilding' that the inspectors had NOT been taken to by Mr. Smith, and which is found to contain dogs being 'housed' in crates.
So much for being shown 'all the dogs' by Mr. Smith.
by Jenni78 on 28 February 2018 - 22:02
by DuganVomEichenluft on 01 March 2018 - 11:03
Thank you for pointing that out. I had missed that during my readings. I went back and read it again and see what you're saying.
I'm curious to see the final and accurate outcome.
You must be logged in to reply to posts