Being slandered by kiesgsd - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

cherjam81

by cherjam81 on 11 January 2017 - 17:01

Mithuna, go back to page 2 and read mrdarcy's comment. Then go look. He's there.

susie

by susie on 11 January 2017 - 17:01

OP, there was no "Lord" in the pedigree 3 days ago, I wonder how it´s possible now...
Instead of getting upset about a comment BASED ON the data YOU offered, you should have done your homework and correct the pedigree as fast as possible ( still A LOT of unknown ancestors...) - your fault, nobody´s else.

So by now out of 64 great great great great grandparents there is twice "Don" - that´s like telling people you are an American native because of two great great great great grandparents from 150 years ago.

I don´t know your dog, he may be the best dog of the world, but you don´t do yourself a favor by promoting his way to far back DDR ancestors - just tell people about the advantages of your dog, or it´s direct ancestors.


mrdarcy (admin)

by mrdarcy on 11 January 2017 - 18:01

This is indeed ridiculous, no way would I class this dog as DDR stud. I will keep my opinions to my self as to breeding with this dog!! The reason for reopening this thread was to show that this dog does have Lord in his pedigree way back nothing more!!! Susie, 3 days ago there was no Lord as the pedigree had more missing dogs than entered, after some research by our pedigree team the pedigree gaps, that could be, were filled in.

 

THREAD AGAIN CLOSED, as all that needs to be posted has been, move on guys.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top