should the breed standard be changed? - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by incubus22 on 19 March 2008 - 18:03


allaboutthedawgs

by allaboutthedawgs on 19 March 2008 - 19:03

Why have a standard if you're going to conform the standard to the dog instead of the dog to the standard?


by incubus22 on 19 March 2008 - 19:03

i didnt say that. look a little deeper.

allaboutthedawgs

by allaboutthedawgs on 19 March 2008 - 19:03

You didn't say anything.  Your posts came out blank. I assumed that's what you meant from the subject line.


by incubus22 on 19 March 2008 - 19:03

i'm sure you'll probably make it onto the next season of jerry springer without trying too hard.

by Uglydog on 19 March 2008 - 19:03

YES...

THe Standard should ONLY be a Working Standard, withStrict standards of Breeding & Testing.something that Max would approve of.

He is rolling in his grave at the present time and for the last deacde or two.


tigermouse

by tigermouse on 19 March 2008 - 20:03

uglydog i thoroughly agree.


allaboutthedawgs

by allaboutthedawgs on 19 March 2008 - 20:03

Don't really know what your problem is. I was only answering the subject line as there was not body of the message showing.

I can't imagine what caused you to take offense? I wasn't saying you didn't say anything in a "what you said didn't mean anything" sort of way.  I really see a blank message form under your title.


tigermouse

by tigermouse on 19 March 2008 - 20:03

i think incubus22 is havin probs with the site.pm not been sent properly either.lol


allaboutthedawgs

by allaboutthedawgs on 19 March 2008 - 20:03

Then why the rude remark? Tiring.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top