This is a placeholder text
Group text
by incubus22 on 19 March 2008 - 18:03
by allaboutthedawgs on 19 March 2008 - 19:03
Why have a standard if you're going to conform the standard to the dog instead of the dog to the standard?
by incubus22 on 19 March 2008 - 19:03
by allaboutthedawgs on 19 March 2008 - 19:03
You didn't say anything. Your posts came out blank. I assumed that's what you meant from the subject line.
by incubus22 on 19 March 2008 - 19:03
by Uglydog on 19 March 2008 - 19:03
YES...
THe Standard should ONLY be a Working Standard, withStrict standards of Breeding & Testing.something that Max would approve of.
He is rolling in his grave at the present time and for the last deacde or two.
by tigermouse on 19 March 2008 - 20:03
uglydog i thoroughly agree.
by allaboutthedawgs on 19 March 2008 - 20:03
Don't really know what your problem is. I was only answering the subject line as there was not body of the message showing.
I can't imagine what caused you to take offense? I wasn't saying you didn't say anything in a "what you said didn't mean anything" sort of way. I really see a blank message form under your title.
by tigermouse on 19 March 2008 - 20:03
i think incubus22 is havin probs with the site.pm not been sent properly either.lol
by allaboutthedawgs on 19 March 2008 - 20:03
Then why the rude remark? Tiring.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top