by jmcnees1 on 17 July 2018 - 18:07
by susie on 17 July 2018 - 20:07
In case a judge really likes the dog in front of him temperament wise ( self confidence, grip, speed, expression = the whole dog) points are not important.
Points don't pass on, temperament in the best case does.
A high performance on local level may be the result of a skilled handler, a low performance on local level may be the result of a not that good handler...
As soon as we talk about regional or even national level you need a good dog AND a good handler...😀
by jmcnees1 on 17 July 2018 - 21:07
by susie on 17 July 2018 - 21:07
Judges know a lot of dogs out of their surrounding, may have seen them before, maybe even offspring.
It's about the sum of aĺl of this.
by jmcnees1 on 17 July 2018 - 23:07
by susie on 19 July 2018 - 19:07
Some judges never give any recommendations at all, and some love to do so.
In case of breeding decisions nobody really cares the interested breeders tend to take a look by themselves.
There are douzends of VA dogs without any recommendations ( first breed survey ) out there...
It's not important.
by Rik on 20 July 2018 - 00:07
I've replied to a couple of your posts jm, but this is the last one. I think you just want to argue with the system.
1. No, I wouldn't take any SV judge evaluation (on Character) without seeing the dog/dogs, either in person or at least on video.
2. it is what it is on S/L. take from it what it is or quit trying to subtly default it and just say what you want to say.
by Sunsilver on 20 July 2018 - 13:07
You must be logged in to reply to posts