Kinda quiet over here, ain't it ? - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

mrdarcy (admin)

by mrdarcy on 19 July 2015 - 11:07

" Kinda quiet over here, ain't it ? " Yep and it's soooooo good not to read all the nonsense,Wink Smile

 

vk4, who's gonna tell us when the world's going to die? Don't think ya need telling you will know, lol,lol,lol

 

Maybe now the OT forum can be used for what it was intended....some good OT subjects other than the crazy stuff we've had for so long?????


Hundmutter

by Hundmutter on 19 July 2015 - 11:07

Considering how often you 'like'/'agree' with posts on those

'nonsence' topics, Darcy,  I think that is a bit rich  Tongue Smile.

 

Pete - I assumed Admin meant Donald Trump;  he has been insulting

fellow Republicans again.  The international nooz medja  did not

think it of more than US interest,  I had to search for the event ! 


by joanro on 19 July 2015 - 13:07

Trump is leading in the republican field for presidential nomination. He's insulted all Mexicans and insulted John McCain. The guy is a goofball and seems to get tremendous pleasure in being obnoxious and revolting.

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 19 July 2015 - 14:07

The international news doesn't cover it because they realize the guy is a buffoon, he is leading in polls because that is the state of the Republican party and its supporters. If the most obnixious republican canidate is leading in the polls what does that say about those supporting him?


by joanro on 19 July 2015 - 15:07

" If the most obnixious republican canidate is leading in the polls what does that say about those supporting him? "
My point, exactly:-)

by vk4gsd on 19 July 2015 - 15:07

how did he get rich?


by LMH on 19 July 2015 - 16:07

Well GSD......You've managed to ban everyone whose political views conflict with yours.  How sporting of you to pose this question.  LOL. 

I hope he wins.  Debate with you.......not a chance.  I told you once it's futile when the opponent BANS.  If you show some integrity and UNban all who fell victim to your wrath then the game is on. 

Sorry.....but it's really sticking in my craw and in good conscience I have to say it.  How could you ban Yellowrose?  The woman so enjoyed participating.......not to mention the harassment of Two Moons.  He was just basically a nice guy.  Slamdunc???? Is there any doubt your feelings for cops.  I'm no cop lover, but I'm also no cop hater. I'd love to discuss Holder being sent to Ferguson and the ensuing crap.  But.......you BAN.    RPK????? Seemed like a nice guy . BeeTree??? Just someone who got your goat.  But....someone who pm'd me to help with a technical question.  She also took in a rescue.  Mountain Lion???? Say what you want.....I think he's basically a nice guy.  He gave what he got. Was he banned too?  I'm not saying I agree with all of their opinions......but I'd never have banned them.  Furthermore,  I just about disagree with almost everything you've ever said, but wouldn't ban you either.

You have very definite political views. All those banned have political views that differ.  Those are the facts. 

I've been here for ten years.   I saw it all and (what's more) remember it all.  If you're not going to bring back the people you banned, please stop starting these annoying threads.   


Hundmutter

by Hundmutter on 19 July 2015 - 17:07

"... please stop starting these annoying threads."

LMH

 

Hhhmmmm - that says it all, really.  YOU are annoyed by the threds Admin raises

because YOU do not agree with Admin's perspective.  So he should keep quiet ?

 

Whatever the pros & cons re people who have been banned / chosen to stop posting,

most of what Admin puts up (and I expect Travels, vk4, and me  fall under your same

proscriptive idea of who should be able to post what ?) is interesting, rather than an

annoyance.  Maybe some things I agree with him on;  maybe some I don't - but at least

they are articulate and relevant,  so worth reading.  If they annoy you, no one is forcing

you to read them or reply to them. 


GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 19 July 2015 - 18:07

LMH,

 

I didn't start the thread. I didn't pose the question, I really don't care if they are here or not. I have given chance after chance to most of these members and they still could not get it. If there is one person I feel bad about it is Preston but when I have so many members complaining to me about him taking over the OT forum with thread after thread about crazy conspiracies, I did what I felt I needed to do. You have no clue what all the facts are, none and that is the fact.

As far as the bans go you have no clue but I will fill you in a little.

YR-was the one who turned into Oli that I was hacking the site, remember all my posts getting deleted? Remember Oli looking like a fool because he believed her and then had to retract what he said because once he looked into it it was obvious that she/they lied. Then when she did get banned a few times and was let back she proceed to run to multiple members in PMs to try and egg me on, to get my goat. To cause problems between moderation and members, yes this is so what this site needs, right? I have the proof sent to me in PMs from multiple members.

Two Moons?- I like Two Moons we didn't agree on a lot of things and he got banned for consantly cutting Oli and the site down, it was a short ban and he was let back. He decided to leave on his own.

Slamdunc-was finally for the last time banned because he couldn't quit cutting this site and Oli down, we don't need poison like that here trash talking the owner, the site and admin. Slamdunc really caused his own problems when he found a glitch that allowed him access to the admin forum and instead of being the good cop and telling admin that there was a problem he proceeded to tell other members about the backdoor and still he wasn't banned for good. Still given multiple chances but he couldn't stop coming after me and trash talking this site. Calling me a fag. No need for that here.

Beetree-was given chance after chance after chance, until I was put in a spot of either banning her or losing admin.

Mountain Lion-just couldn't get over the past - if you remember so well you surely knew or had a hint that ML was one of my most trusted friends here, until I became an admin and he found out because another top notch member told him which she should never had done because Oli asked all of us to not release the names of the others.

 

LMH, you really have no clue what went on behind the scenes, nor really what led to what, all you have is what you perceive and honestly that is not nor will it ever be the full truth.

"You have very definite political views. All those banned have political views that differ.  Those are the facts. " Those are the facts the way you see it but those are far from the facts. I liked having most of those people here just to debate and go back and forth with but when the other admins start questioning why I am crazy enough to keep bringing back the same people who keep causing the same problems well it doesn't take a genius to figure out that everytime I brought someone back and they did the same type things that got them a short ban that eventually I would lose the admins after all they usually get stuck cleaning up the mess.

 

You can say what you want about me to your hearts content. I really don't care. Ask anyone who truly knows me and they would tell you I am not the type to hold a grudge. I don't ban people because I disagree with them. Truth be told I wasn't the one that pushed for most of them to be banned, I did ultimately agree with the others but I can't think of very many times I pushed for a ban. Honestly, you really have no clue what you are talking about but go ahead and get it all off your shoulders. And again to make it very clear I didn't start this thread and those not here any longer because of being banned were given so many chances.


by LMH on 19 July 2015 - 19:07

GSD---I know you didn't start this thread.  All of you were guilty abusers and innocent victims.  I'm speaking honestly and not trying to cause dissension. I don't really care to extrapolate further on the past, but take my word for it.....I had a clue.

You struck that one chord I found impossible to ignore when you mentioned Trump.  This election is wayyyy too important for me to sit by and constantly read so many one-sided views. I don't want to fight.  Discussion would be my preferance.

I have to go.....am already late.....and being badgered to "move it".






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top