The Truth About AnezkaK9 LLC and Julie Leoni (Bernet) - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Hetfieldfreak on 19 July 2014 - 15:07

Thank you Hans for the help you're attempting to provide. We really can't thank you enough.

I'll be the first to admit I didn't do the due diligence I should have prior to buying the pup from AnezkaK9, LLC. Had I known then what I know now I never would have purchased the dog from her, Jinopo dog or not. That doesn't excuse the fact she failed to register her litters and/or most of her dogs.

I was friends with this person, I thought anyway. At the time I had no reason to believe otherwise. I have the cancelled checks, Delta Cargo flight information and payment for shipment, correspondence pertaining to full AKC registration and hip/elbow guarantee claim. Want to see it? PM me and I'll show you. But I'm not posting it on a public forum.

We posted here, Alpine K9's forum and started an FB group in an effort to help others out that are in the same boat and may not know where to turn. If you choose instead to ridicule, then please move on. We don't need it.

I'm a man of integrity. I would never deliberately and/or unjustly call a kennel out unless I had the facts to back it up. I have much better things to do with my time.

It takes approximately 8 months to convert a foreign bitch to AKC and register the litter. It has been roughly 2 years and 1 month. Any correspondence from me to the kennel gets ignored. Enough is enough.

 

 


by NA7 on 19 July 2014 - 16:07

Hetfieldfreak,
well said!

by beetree on 19 July 2014 - 16:07

Seems like you feel you are in good hands, now. Good Luck and enjoy your dogs.


kitkat3478

by kitkat3478 on 19 July 2014 - 16:07

Hans, I was only referring to the 'health' part of a guarantee. Say you have a year old dog that gets 'any' defect, mainly I guess I mean HD/ED, etc.,

WHY would a breeder require that dog be returned before they would give a replacement if the owner wanted to keep their dog?

   Of course there are different circumstance that require different ways of dealing with them,

BUT...in general, if you guarantee your dogs, back them up, stand behind them. Do the right thing for both dog and owner.

   If you sell a dog WITH registration papers, GIVE the registration papers. Yeah, things get delayed esp in transfer of ownership, but you can easily verify where you stand in the transition thru e-mail. Not that hard, and you really owe it to the person buying the dog.

   If you don't have the papers, or can't get the papers, than sell the dog as, and for, what it is...

ALOT LESS MONEY


by Hetfieldfreak on 19 July 2014 - 18:07

Kitkat - I've (We've) put in just under two years with this dog. Bonded, trained, etc. He's a very nice, incredibly civil and fearless Jipo-Me offspring with an off switch. I can't part with him. But you are right. If I were to part with him it would be for alot less money.

Our issue is not with the dogs. It's with the kennel. Principle and integrity. We want what was promised and nothing more. Full AKC registration is just one of those promises.

AnezkaK9, LLC had nothing to do with the genetics of these pups either. The kennel purchased Hanach Jipo-Me pregnant from Jinopo in the Czech Republic and slapped their name on the pups. Then, didn't bother registering the litter.

This is not the only litter. There's also the Cate Alanex x Ox z Jirkova Dvora litter we are looking into. Cate was never converted from CMKU to AKC and I believe Ox has since passed. Not sure what's going to happen there.

We don't galavant the internet trolling for unsuspecting, undeserving kennels to call them out without reason. Had we been provided papers, etc. for our dogs this obviously would not be happening right now. We truly have better things to do with our time.

Very unfortunate for all involved.


by NA7 on 19 July 2014 - 20:07

Hetfieldfreak, best of luck! Its an unnecessary fight. Routing for you all and your dogs.

by Julie Leoni on 01 August 2014 - 17:08

Here is the REAL TRUTH about this situation.  

This whole nightmare started with me "hiring" two ex cops to help and train my dogs.  Cheryl Goede and Kevin Goede. I paid them nearly 14 thousand dollars ( I can show you cancelled checks).  They also took a Hannach X Art puppy which they NEVER paid me for. They NEVER completed training on my dogs and then demanded AKC papers.   I am NOT the first person that they have scammed.   Shortly after I kicked them out of a house that I let them live in RENT free, they started bashing me.     The arrangement with Cheryl and Kevin was to start the training on the puppies in which they charged 500.00 per month for that training and then they went to their homes.   John Hale initially contacted me about "rescuing a dog". He arranged for his MOM to pay me  money for the dog after "negotiation" the payment for what was going to be a "neutered" dog and could NOT afford a trained puppy from the Hanach X Art litter. I gave him a couple of names of breeders/rescue contacts.   We negotiated a "Limited Registration" deal in which I kept his puppy, crate trained it for nearly a month and started all of the obedience for $2,000.00  It wasn't until after he got his puppy and saw how nice that it was that he "demanded papers".  IF you will remember it took me a long time to get my papers from you guys (which I totally understood).  I have all of the correspondences with John and how he "changed the game midstream" in demanding papers.   The same situation occurred with Stacy Schulte.  She wanted a puppy to do Cadaver scent work.  She "negotiated" the price of 2,000.00 dollars for TWO puppies. After she got her dog, she also demanded papers.  I explained that it would take time because the bitch was imported and I had not yet received my papers. She NEVER bought another puppy from me and then demanded AKC papers, even though that was NOT the initial agreement.   All three of the above mentioned people are good friends and in my opinion have been conspiring with the first couple, Cheryl and Kevin to "fraudulently" use their littermates' papers to breed the puppy that they NEVER paid for.   I have sent ALL of the PROOF to AKC to substantiate my claims.  They are basically  trying  to get AKC papers from Hans NOW after "negotiating better deals from me" because papers were NOT important to them when they were purchasing their puppies. NOT one of them asked for a contract until over a year later because again, Papers were NOT important to them at the time.   Jenn Wilmott/Robert Davidson were sold a Cate X Ox puppy.  I kept that puppy and paid to have it trained for 2 months.  After shipping the puppy. I got a call 3 weeks later demanding a full refund because the puppy had "mange and worms".  I immediately took the puppy that I kept back from that litter to my Vet and had it checked out.  My vet did a skin scraping and my puppy tested negative to demodect and sarcoptic mange.  I conveyed that to them and asked them to call my vet. I also had Cate checked out in which she tested negative.   I offered to purchase their puppy back at full asking price including the training money AND shipping costs.  To which their response:  "No, we have changed our mind because we Love the dog and we think that it was really just stress from the flight". I have since learned that they are also tight with the ex cops who took advantage of me.   This is a "gang mentality" in which I will fight to the end for the "principal of the matter". This is NOTHING More than emotional black mail for Cheryl Goede to get AKC papers for a puppy in which she NEVER paid for NOR did her husband fulfill our training/titling agreement on my Dog(s).  Any attempt to help them will be tortious interference with my business and providing a dog theif with papers. I have forwarded all of this proof to AKC.        

by cjlw01 on 01 August 2014 - 19:08

And in the conversations with Robert Davidson, did he also state he did not want papers Julie BERNET... use your real name would you, that way people are able to search your foreclosure & credit card debt as well as your felony charges.

ALSO, Havoc CAN BE bred and when I am able to screen shot the rest of the conversation hopefully Atzlan will see that you initially blamed his pup, I will do one better and have that sent direct to him as well. Demodectic mange IS passed from mother to pup AND I ALSO have the screen shots of Kelley admitting Draco had it as well and the vet paperwork. Also, your words that your own dogs were itchy, I wouldn't believe you took your dogs to any vet, seeing as how you OBVIOUSLY aren't able to afford a mortgage. And I also do NOT have faith in your vet seeing as how Havoc was shipped with entire patches of fur missing. As for shipping him back, I REFUSE to allow ANY dog to live in their mess on mulch, drinking dirty, bacteria and parasite infested water (& yes, I have those pics as well).

Continue to sink yourself, I am getting quite a bit of joy out of this :)

by k9marshal on 01 August 2014 - 20:08

Julie, Julie, Julie...you have put me through enough. Please don't go lying about how I bought my dog...something just may come back and bite you in the ass.

by Julie Leoni on 01 August 2014 - 21:08

Good Luck with that breeding Jenn!  ;)

 

If you send Atzlan kennel the "full conversation" you will see that Tika did have a "hot spot" shortly after she was shipped, however, my vet confirmed that it was NOT mange. It was reated and healed.  You have NEVER been to my house, so please do NOT even try to "make up stuff" about the condition of my dogs, kennels, and water.  

Stacy, Cheryl, and Kevin were at my house and if they really found the conditions so appalling, don't you think that they would have reported me two years ago?  ;)

FYI, My Dogs and I are still living in my house. I HATE to dissapoint you, but there was and is NOT a foreclosure on MY house.  I still own both of my homes!  Thanks for your concern though! :)

 






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top